Popular feature requests that I won't implement any time soon

• Q: Photo support?
  A: Photo support shouldn't be too hard, but it's nothing I'm personally interested in at the moment. It's not trivial, though, and would require a couple of hours for research and development.

Popular feature requests that I won't implement, ever.

• Q: Write support?
  A: Forget it. Writing isn't trivial. At least iTunes™ will want to write to the same database files concurrently, thus we'd need a way to tell iTunes™ to stop - and even to re-synchronize afterwards we have written our changes. Even if we could do that, how would we reorder entries in a playlist? By renaming the prefixing index manually? This is totally unusable in my opinion. iTunes™ is really great at managing the contents of your library and your iPod™s. The only thing that it doesn't allow you to do (probably by intention) is to easily copy content off your library or your iPods to a location YOU desire. iTunesFS fixes that "problem", nothing more and nothing less.

• Q: Make iTunesFS work with the Fink package?
  A: Create a symlink instead. iTunesFS links against /usr/local/lib/libfuse.0.dylib, so make sure it finds the version installed by Fink there - if you really must use the Fink version.

• Q: Is it possible to share the iTunes library to make it available on the local network (via Zeroconf/Bonjour)?
  A: Personally I don't have any interest in this feature while technically it's possible to do this with iTunesFS. However, there are several obstacles to overcome and it's pretty much non-trivial.