Funny. Yesterday I paid 40 Euros for Supreme Commander installed it and ended up playing a game which cost nothing.
Desktop Tower Defense is totally addictive. And even if you complete it, you still wonder if there isn't a better way to play it... Don't try this game if you have work to do.
Supreme Commander needs some new hardware. Checking the Gaspoweredgames forum and various benchmarks, I figure I need a machine with at least 2GB RAM, a E6600 CPU and an 8800GTS videocard. I kind of wonder if such a machine is actually more powerful than a PS3, comparable or maybe even weaker ? I have no idea.
Ok enough aimless rambling...
Comments (3)
I Bought supreme commander and CnC 3 at the same time, compleated both, then sold CnC. now i play Sup Com...
I run it perfectly happily on E6300 with ATI 1950 and couple of gig of ram total upgrade cost me less than £550
PS3 is a monster that is way way more powerfull, it has 7 Cell processors with 9 cores per cell ( one power chip in the center and 8 vector units ) if it was in the TOP 500 in 2006 it would have been in the top 100 fastest computers on planet earth at the much touted 1.8 Terra flop throughput.
Posted by Sam | May 31, 2007 10:25 PM
Posted on May 31, 2007 22:25
Since it seems you never have a comment posted, here's one from a person on the interweb looking for supreme commander tower defense.
Posted by omg | June 7, 2007 1:28 AM
Posted on June 7, 2007 01:28
Yeah, I am uninteresting :)
Actually I think it could be doable. Just have the commander in a shield on the exit and funnel the incoming baddies through Point Defenses and Artillery and Missile launchers.
The shielded commander should attract the baddies well enough.
Posted by Nat! | June 8, 2007 12:32 PM
Posted on June 8, 2007 12:32