New Mulle kybernetiK homepage
One of these days we'll do a major overhaul of the site.
« September 2004 | Main | November 2004 »
One of these days we'll do a major overhaul of the site.
I don't see the point of the new single CPU G5, so the options are (monitor included in price):
| iMac 20" | G5 Dual 2.5 GHz | G5 Dual 2.0 GHz | G5 Dual 1.8 GHz |
| 1.8 GHz | 5 GHz | 4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| 600MHz frontside bus | 1.25GHz frontside bus/processor | 1GHz frontside bus/processor | 900MHz frontside bus/processor |
| NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra | ATI Radeon 9800 XT | ATI Radeon 9800 XT | ATI Radeon 9800 XT |
| $1,899.00 | $4,598.00 | $4,148.00 | $3,648.00 |
The iMac 20" is comparatively really cheap. I could buy about two iMacs or more for the price of any of the Dual G5s. For the G5s the increase from 3.6 GHz to 4 GHz is 11% in Hz and 14% in $. The increase from 4 GHz to 5 GHz is 25% in Hz and 17% in money. The 1.8 GHz machines are a little more crippled AFAIK, still I think it should be either the 2x1.8 or the 2x2.5.
But does it make sense as a development machine ? It would be painful, if the iMac 20" would compile only a little slower than the Dual G5.
Any experiences or advice out there ? Is the iMac 20" LCD panel as good as the Cinema Display ?
cat <<EOF > foo.m
@interface _Foo
{
}
@end
@interface Foo : _Foo
{
}
@end
@interface _Foo ( XXX)
@end
@implementation _Foo ( XXX)
@end
EOF
gcc -c -ObjC foo.m
and now
sed 's/_Foo/Bar/g' < foo.m > bar.m gcc -c -ObjC bar.m
This page contains all entries posted to Nat!'s Web Journal in October 2004. They are listed from oldest to newest.
September 2004 is the previous archive.
November 2004 is the next archive.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.